<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing Search Engine Launch &amp; SMX Advanced Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semclubhouse.com/microsoft-bing-and-smx-advanced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semclubhouse.com/microsoft-bing-and-smx-advanced/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:14:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 17shadu</title>
		<link>http://www.semclubhouse.com/microsoft-bing-and-smx-advanced/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>17shadu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semclubhouse.com/?p=642#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Google coming out on top without major concern for this new Engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google coming out on top without major concern for this new Engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing is missing the point. It’s not the destination. &#171; John W Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.semclubhouse.com/microsoft-bing-and-smx-advanced/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing is missing the point. It’s not the destination. &#171; John W Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semclubhouse.com/?p=642#comment-527</guid>
		<description>[...] the Twitter trends buzz. There was also recent push at SMX Advanced that Chris Smith discusses on SemClubHouse.com. No doubt there is a strong marketing effort by Microsoft to get people talking about Bing. In that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Twitter trends buzz. There was also recent push at SMX Advanced that Chris Smith discusses on SemClubHouse.com. No doubt there is a strong marketing effort by Microsoft to get people talking about Bing. In that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silver</title>
		<link>http://www.semclubhouse.com/microsoft-bing-and-smx-advanced/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semclubhouse.com/?p=642#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Jozef, you&#039;re right that the local results seem to fall short.

I think it may&#039;ve been Greg Sterling that whispered to us that it appeared Microsoft had done little more on the local front than virtually clone the Google 10-pack in the blended results display.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jozef, you&#8217;re right that the local results seem to fall short.</p>
<p>I think it may&#8217;ve been Greg Sterling that whispered to us that it appeared Microsoft had done little more on the local front than virtually clone the Google 10-pack in the blended results display.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Ronk</title>
		<link>http://www.semclubhouse.com/microsoft-bing-and-smx-advanced/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ronk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semclubhouse.com/?p=642#comment-524</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been testing Bing for the past couple days. While I&#039;m not a big fan of Microsoft, I try to keep an open mind.

While I do not notice a big difference in the quality of search results; I do like how the results are laid out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been testing Bing for the past couple days. While I&#8217;m not a big fan of Microsoft, I try to keep an open mind.</p>
<p>While I do not notice a big difference in the quality of search results; I do like how the results are laid out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jozef Foerch</title>
		<link>http://www.semclubhouse.com/microsoft-bing-and-smx-advanced/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jozef Foerch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semclubhouse.com/?p=642#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Sounds like you guys are getting the red carpet up there!  To be honest..though it is far better in design than the preceding Microsoft Search Engine...it is still lacking in the local search department.  The Local &quot;results&quot; are neither as aesthetically appealing or the functionality that Google has in it&#039;s corner.  Throw in Google&#039;s new Dashboard for Local Listings (conveniently timed release date?) and you still have Google coming out on top without major concern for this new Engine.  I definately agree that this will increase Microsoft&#039;s percentage portion of Search Engine Traffic though I have to consider that this could be a temporary increase that will inevitably decrease over time after the &quot;hype&quot; is up.  Have fun up there Chris!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you guys are getting the red carpet up there!  To be honest..though it is far better in design than the preceding Microsoft Search Engine&#8230;it is still lacking in the local search department.  The Local &#8220;results&#8221; are neither as aesthetically appealing or the functionality that Google has in it&#8217;s corner.  Throw in Google&#8217;s new Dashboard for Local Listings (conveniently timed release date?) and you still have Google coming out on top without major concern for this new Engine.  I definately agree that this will increase Microsoft&#8217;s percentage portion of Search Engine Traffic though I have to consider that this could be a temporary increase that will inevitably decrease over time after the &#8220;hype&#8221; is up.  Have fun up there Chris!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
